رهیافتی کیفی به فرادانش مدیریتی، بر پایه روش تحلیل مضمون

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس

2 استادیار دانشگاه خلیج فارس

3 کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه خلیج فارس

10.22080/shrm.2024.5220

چکیده

به ساده‌ترین بیان، فرادانش، دانش در باره دانش دیگران است. هرچه دانش سازمان در باره دانش دیگر شخصیت‌های حقیقی و حقوقی بیشتر باشد، انتظار می‌رود تصمیم‌های راهبردی در سازمان، با کیفیت بیشتری گرفته شود. این پرسش که مسئولیت مدیران در برابر فرادانش سازمانی چیست؟ به قدر کفایت، تئوریزه و مدل نشده است. این پژوهش در راستای پر کردن این خلاء نظری در زمینه فرادانش راهبردی مدیریتی انجام شده است. از منظر فلسفی این پژوهش در دسته پارادایم تفسیری قرار می‌گیرد که با رویکرد کیفی انجام شده است. از آنجا که این پژوهش از رویکرد تحلیل مضمون انعکاسی بهره برده است. برای راهبرد تحلیل مضمون انعکاسی از مدل برون و کلارک (2006) استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش مدیران بخش دولتی در استان بوشهر بوده و نظرات 11 مدیر ارشد سازمانی بخش دولتی با مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته مرور شده است. در کدگذاری اولیه تعداد 176 کد مشخص گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان از آن دارد که سازه فرادانش راهبردی مدیریتی از دو مضمون فرعی فرادانش برون‌سازمانی و فرادانش درون‌سازمانی تشکیل شده است. در فرادانش درون‌سازمانی به ابعادی به مانند فرهنگ به‌اشتراک‌گذاری منابع دانش، ظرفیت ساختاردهی مدیر به فرادانش، کیفیت تعامل مدیر در فرادانش، شناخت مدیر از منابع دانش در سازمان اشاره شده است. همچنین در فرادانش برون‌سازمانی به ابعادی چون شناخت مدیر از منابع دانش برون سازمانی، درک مدیر از ظرفیت‌ها و چالش‌های محیطی دانش، شناخت مدیر از منابع دانش مراجع بالادستی و توان مدیر در انتقال دانش بین مدیران میانی و بالادستی توجه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A qualitative approach to Managerial Meta-knowledge based on theme analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedyaghoub Hosseini 1
  • mani arman 2
  • Mahbobeh Mohsenifard 3
1 Business Administration Department, Persian Gulf University
2 Assistant professor at PGU
3 M.A of Persian Gulf University
چکیده [English]

In simplest terms, meta-knowledge is knowledge about the knowledge of others. The more an organization's knowledge about the knowledge of real and legal personalities increases, the higher the expectation for quality strategic decisions within the organization. The question of what responsibilities managers have in relation to meta-knowledge has not been adequately theorized and modeled. This research aims to fill this theoretical gap in the field of strategic meta-knowledge management. The methodology used in this research adopts a theme analysis approach and explores the experiences of managers in this area. The experiences of 11 senior organizational managers were reviewed through in-depth and semi-structured interviews. The research findings indicate that the structural meta-knowledge of strategic management consists of two components: external meta-knowledge and internal meta-knowledge. In internal meta-knowledge, dimensions such as the culture of sharing knowledge resources, the manager's capacity to structure meta-knowledge, the quality of the manager's interaction with meta-knowledge, and the manager's knowledge of knowledge resources within the organization are mentioned. Additionally, in external meta-knowledge, dimensions such as the manager's knowledge of external knowledge resources, the manager's understanding of the capacities and challenges of the knowledge environment, the manager's knowledge of higher-level knowledge sources, and the manager's ability to transfer knowledge among middle and higher-level managers are highlighted.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Meta-knowledge
  • Managerial meta-knowledge
  • Strategic meta-knowledge
  • theme analysis
Benkler, Y. (2007). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. United States: Yale University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chorpita, B. F. (2019). Commentary: Metaknowledge is power: envisioning models to address unmet mental health needs: reflections on Kazdin (2019). Jornal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 473-476.
Davison, R. M., Ou, C. X., & Martinsons, M. G. (2012). Information technology to support informal knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 23(1), 89-109.
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & Knippenberg, D. v. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 12(1), 22-49.
Dossena, C., Mizzau, L., & Mochi, F. (2019). Social Media in HRM: A Humanistic Management Perspective. Advanced Series in Management, 23, 201-220.
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2009). How the crowd can teach. In Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies (pp. 1-17). IGI Global.
Engelbrecht, A., Gerlach, J., Benlian, A., & Buxmann, P. (2019). How employees gain meta-knowledge using enterprise social networks: A validation and extension of communication visibility theory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(3), 292-309.
Engelbrecht, A., P. Gerlach, J., Benlian, A., & Buxmann, P. (2019). How employees gain meta-knowledge using enterprise social networks: A validation and extension of communication visibility theory. strategic information systems, 28(3), 292-309.
Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Fostering sharing of unshared knowledge by having access to the collaborators’ meta-knowledge structures. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2078-2087.
Foss, N. J., & Jensen, H. (2018). Managerial Meta-knowledge and Adaptation: Governance Choice When Firms Don’t Know Their Capabilities. Strategic Organization, 18(2), 153-176.
Franke, H., Foerstl, K., & Heese, S. H. (2020). The Interaction Effect of Goal Misalignment and Metaknowledge Distribution on Team Decision Making in Operations and Supply Chain Management. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 331-361.
Fusch, P., Fusch, G., & Ness, L. (2017). How to conduct a mini-ethnographic case study: A guide for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 22(3), 923-941.
Gee, J. (2007). Affinity Spaces: From Age of Mythology to Todays Schools. In Good Video Games + Good Learning (pp. 87-103). New York: Peter Lang.
Ginkel, W. P., & Knippenberg, D. v. (2009). Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: when and why does it work? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 218-229.
Ha, S.-T., Lo, M.-C., & Wang, Y.-C. (2016). Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance: A Test on SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 184-189.
Hayashi, P. (2011). The use of resources in the creation of wine icons and the co-creation of value. Brazil: (Doctoral dissertation). School of Business, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Jensen, h. (2016). Economic Organization and Imperfect Managerial Knowledge: A Study of the Role of Managerial Meta-Knowledge in the Management of Distributed Knowledge. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783-808.
Karimi Jafari, F., Daneshvar, M., & Saberi, F. (2024). Identifying the Consequences of Human Resources Knowledge Hiding with a Mixed Approach. Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management,, 6(10), 218-179.
khashei, V., & Daneshvar, M. (2016). The effect of Transactive Memory System on Team Performance with Rregard to Exploitative Learning Strategy and Strategic Orientations. Management Studies in Development and Evolution,, 25(81), 81-100.
Knippenberg, D. V. (2017). Team Innovation. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 211-233.
Lech, P. (2014). Managing knowledge in IT projects: a framework for enterprise system implementation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 551-573.
Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1-19.
Lewis, k., & Lange, D. (2005). Transactive memory system,lerning,and lerning transfer. organization science, 16(6), 581-598.
Li, C.-R., Li, C.-X., Lin, C.-J., & Liu, J. (2018). The influence of team reflexivity and shared meta-knowledge on the curvilinear relationship between team diversity and team ambidexterity. Management Decision, 56(5), 1033-1050.
Li, W., & Xu, X. (2012). An Empirical Analysis on China’s Regional Knowledge Productivity Efficiency Based on SFA. In Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Theory and Practice.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg., 114, 935-943.
Madani, J., Hafezifar, A., & EbrahimPour, H. (2023). Model of knowledge-based Human Resources Management in public organizations. Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 5(9), 262-241.
McNamara, A. A. (2019). Community engagement and subgroup meta-knowledge: some factors in the soul of a community. Comput Stat, 34, 1511–1535.
Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication?,. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117-133.
Novak, J. D. (1983). Can metalearning and metaknowledge strategies to help students learn how to learn serve as a basis for overcoming misconceptions. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics (pp. 118–30). NY: Cornell University.
Ozenir, E. (2019). How does functional diversity lead to team innovation? The roles of information elaboration and shared meta-knowledge. Utrecht University.
Park, J. Y., Im, K. S., & Kim, J. S. (2013). The role of IT human capability in the knowledge transfer process in IT outsourcing context. Information & Management, 48(1), 53-61.
RAU, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory: performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746-771.
Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189-229.
Richter, A. W., Knippenberg, v. D., Hirst, G., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282-1290.
Rivera-Vazquez, J., Ortiz-Fournier, L., & Flores, F. (2009). Overcoming cultural barriers for innovation and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(5), 257-270.
Rulke, D. L., Zaheer, S., & Anderson, M. H. (2000). Sources of managers’ knowledge of organizational capabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 134-149.
Sedighi, M., Lukosch, S., Brazier, F., Hamedi, M., & Beers, C. v. (2018). Multi-level knowledge sharing: the role of perceived benefits in different visibility levels of knowledge exchange. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1264-1287.
Sepehri, M., & Riahi, A. (2010). Social Network Analysis Application for Knowledge Management System Needs Elicitation in Knowledge-Based Organizations., 3(3). Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(3), 81-95.
Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346-357.
Van Den Hooff, B., & Ridder, J. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
weber, l., & Mayer, K. (2014). Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective: Investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 344-363.
Wegner, D. (1987). Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. In B. Mullen, & G. Goethals , Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Paula, R. (1991). Transactive Memory in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923-929.
Wei Liang, D., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
Wei, C., Pitafi, A., Kanwal, S., Ali, A., & Ren, M. (2020). Improving Employee Agility Using Enterprise Social Media and Digital Fluency: Moderated Mediation Model. IEEE Access, 8, 68799-68810.
Xu, Y., Sun, J., Wang, G., Wang, S., & Ma, J. (2016). Understanding researchers'metaknowledge contribution behavior in research social network: a social capital perespective. 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Taiwan: Chiayi: Association for Information Systems.
Yunis, A. A., Mohammad Nazir, A., Norasnita, A., & Nor Hidayati, Z. (2019). Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 72-112.
Zangara, M. A., & Sanz, C. (2018). Displaying the Collaborative Process as Meta-knowledge Description of a Mirroring Strategy and Its Results. Argentine Congress of Computer Science. 790, pp. 79-89. Springer Cham.