Ameer, F. and Khan, N.R. (2022). Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review. European Management Journal, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 22 April 2022.
Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741–758
Brettel, M., Chomik, C., & Flatten, T. C. (2015). How organizational culture influences innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking: Fostering entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 868–885.
Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263.
Chang, Y.-Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity insmall-to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17.
Chin, W. W. (2003). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Chuang, S.-P., & Yang, C.-L. (2014). Key success factors when implementing a green-manufacturing system. Production Planning & Control, 25(11), 923–937.
Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
Davari, A. and Rezazadeh, A. (2017). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Tehran: Academic Jihad Publishing Organization. [in Persian]
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.
Demirel, P., Li, Q. C., Rentocchini, F., & Tamvada, J. P. (2019). Born to be green: New insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 759–771.
Deng, X., Long, X., Schuler, D. A., Luo, H., & Zhao, X. (2020). External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: A S-curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 393–408.
Ebrahimi, P., & Mirbargkar, S. M. (2017). Green entrepreneurship andgreen innovation for SME development in market turbulence. EurasianBusiness Review, 7(2), 203–228.
Farrington, T., Curran, R., Gori, K., O'Gorman, K. D., & Queenan, C. J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: Reviewed, rated, revised. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 30–47.
Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 44–56.
Guo, J., Guo, B., Zhou, J., & Wu, X. (2020). How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects ofknowledge attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,155, 119990.
Getele, G. K., Li, T., & Arrive, T. J. (2020). Corporate culture in small and medium enterprises: Application of corporate social responsibility theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27 (2), 897–908
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Haldar, S. (2019). Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability driven entrepreneurship. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1157–1170.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1899–1931.
Jafarinia, S; Norali, M.R and RamzAvar, T. (2020). Investigating the effect of entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capabilities on company performance with a two-column mediation role. Innovation management in Organizational ambidexterity. 2(3), 119-142. [in Persian]
Jansen, J. J., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11),1286–1303.
Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Jeppesen, S. (2017). SMEs and CSR in developing countries. Business & Society, 56(1), 11–22.
Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T. (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 131
Jin, K. G., Drozdenko, R., & DeLoughy, S. (2013). The role of corporate value clusters in ethics, social responsibility, and performance: A study of financial professionals and implications for the financial meltdown. Journal of business ethics, 112(1), 15–24
José Luis, F.M, Olmos-Peñuela, J, Salas-Vallina, A & Alegre Vidal, J. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation and new product development performance in SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation. Technovation, 108(4), 102325
Junaid, A; Veneziani, M; Sarwar, H & Ishtiaq Ishaq, M.I. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial competencies, innovation, and performances in SMEs of Pakistan: Moderating role of social ties. Busines Ethics the Environment & Responsibility, 31(2), 419-437.
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13.
Kuckertz, A. & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal. Busisnes. Ventur. 2010(25), 524–539.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterityand performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role oftop management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management,32(5), 646–672.
Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606
Li, L., Li, G., Tsai, F.-S., Lee, H.-Y., & Lee, C.-H. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on service innovation performance: The roleof dynamic capability for sustainability. Sustainability, 11(10), 2739.
Li, Y., Wei, Z., & Liu, Y. (2010). Strategic orientations, knowledge acquisition, and firm performance: The perspective of the vendor in cross-border outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1457–1482.
Luo, X., & Du, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 703–714.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Mohammadi, I. (2019) . The effect of orientation to the market and orientation to entrepreneurship on company performance (case study: small and medium enterprises of Herat city). National conferences of new achievements in the field of management. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [in Persian].
MayoChi, L. (2021) . The role of green entrepreneurship on environmental performance "based on the self-organization model". Specialized scientific quarterly of new research approaches in management and accounting, 8(2), 10-18.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–167
Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 305–316
Qi, G., Zou, h., & Xie, X. (2020). Governmental inspection and green innovation: Examining the role of environmental capability and institutional development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1774–1785
Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207–221
Santos, M. (2011). CSR in SMEs: Strategies, practices, motivations and obstacles. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 490–507.
Sastry, M. A. (1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 237–275.
Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 413–42
Sharma, E. (2019). A review of corporate social responsibility in developedand developing nations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 712–720.
Shafique. I (2020). Organizational ambidexterity, green entrepreneurialorientation, and environmental performance in SMEs context:Examining the moderating role of perceived CSR. Masood Nawaz Kalyar, Lyallpur BusinessSchool, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123–155
Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the UK. Journal of Business ethics, 47(1), 17–29
Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.
Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37.
Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial managementin large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2019). Firms with benefits: A systematic review of responsible entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 265–284.
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S. and Vinzi, V.E. (2004) A Global Goodness-of-Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modelling. Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, 1, 739-742.
Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity, entrepreneurial orientation, and I-deals: The moderating role of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 145–159.
Wetzels, M, Odekerken-Schröder, G and Oppen, C.V., (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly. 33(1), pp. 177-195.
Yang, M. G. M., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 251-261
Zhuang, Y., Lee, Y., Chang, X., & Kim, R. B. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and corporate social responsibility performance: An empirical study of state-controlled and privately controlled firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 27(1), 383–392.